Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
School Psychology International
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smith, P. K.
Right arrow Articles by Cowie, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Impact of Cooperative Group Work on Ethnic Relations in Middle School

Peter K. Smith

Department of Psychology, University of Sheffield, UK

Michael J. Boulton

Department of Health and Community Studies, Sheffield Hallam University, UK

Helen Cowie

School of Social Studies, Bretton Hall College of the University of Leeds, UK

The potential of an enhanced Cooperative Group Work (CGW) curriculum to increase liking of classmates, reduce sociometric rejection and prejudiced or stereotypically negative attitudes to other ethnic groups, was evaluated with 8and 9-year-olds in three urban middle schools. The main ethnic mix was of white and Asian pupils. In each school, one class followed a normal curriculum (NC) through the school year, another matched class experienced the CGW intervention. The teachers with CGW classes were given in-service training, and used CGW for a minimum of one hour per day. Assessments were made at three time points. The CGW techniques used through the year employed a variety of methods, including trust-building exercises, problem-solving groups, role-playing, discussion groups and reportback sessions. Debriefing sessions were important opportunities for the teachers to discuss difficulties or conflicts and help children resolve them. The results were similar in the three schools. After the intervention, the children who had experienced CGW tended to like each other more, irrespective of race and gender, and to give more positive behavioural nominations to other-race classmates. There were some increased cross-race preference choices from test assessments. There were also some reductions in negative stereotypes of other ethnic groups. These were not generally found in the children in the NC classes. The findings vary in size and significance level, but form a consistent pattern suggesting that the CGW intervention had a positive impact on social relationships in the multi-ethnic classroom.

School Psychology International, Vol. 14, No. 1, 21-42 (1993)
DOI: 10.1177/0143034393141002


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
School Psychology InternationalHome page
E. Andreou, A. Vlachou, and E. Didaskalou
The Roles of Self-Efficacy, Peer Interactions and Attitudes in Bully-Victim Incidents: Implications for Intervention Policy-Practices
School Psychology International, December 1, 2005; 26(5): 545 - 562.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Social and Personal RelationshipsHome page
M. J. Boulton and P. K. Smith
Liking and Peer Perceptions among Asian and White British Children
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, May 1, 1996; 13(2): 163 - 177.
[Abstract]