This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Salkind, N. Articles by Nash, E. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Guns and Chewing Gum

The Perceptions and Reality of Problem Behaviours in Public Schools

Douglas Adams

Craig Dermer

Jackie Heinerikson

B. Jones

Erin Nash

University of Kansas, USA

In a 1994 New York Times article, Barry O'Neill traced the evolution of two lists (one from the 1940s and one from the 1980s) of reportedly serious behaviours in the public schools. He found the origins of the list not to be based on empirical data, but instead to be fabrications based on political philosophy. The purpose of this descriptive study was to compare O'Neill's findings with data collected from both teachers (N = 150) and non-teachers (N = 36). Comparisons were also made between teachers and non-teachers. In general, both teachers and non-teachers rank those behaviours they directly observe as being the most serious with large discrepancies between rankings for similar behaviours (such as drug use and cheating) by both groups. Discussion focuses on the sources of differences between teachers and non-teachers and the general role the media plays in determining what citizens see as misbehaviour.

School Psychology International, Vol. 21, No. 1, 106-112 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/0143034300211008


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?