Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
School Psychology International
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rosenberg, S. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Positive Peers-Differential Impact of a Social Intervention Strategy on Four Personality Subgroups

Steven L. Rosenberg

PSI Affiliates, Twinsburg, Ohio, USA

Using specific educational and social strategies the Positive Peer Group Intervention Program (PPIG) is designed to improve self concept among at-risk students. Teachers were asked to identify children showing any one of four functional and/or dysfunctional characteristics of leaders (Positive Leaders; Controversial Leaders; Rejected Isolates and Neglected Isolates). 'Facilitators' worked with each of these groups. Since each group demonstrated qualitatively different social skills, it was hypothesized that the program would impact them differentially. Scales from the Piers Harris Children's Self-Concept Scale were analysed in a pre-post experimental-control design. After demonstrating statistically significant results, the differences among the four groups were investigated. The practical and educational implications of these differences are discussed.

School Psychology International, Vol. 23, No. 4, 397-415 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/0143034302234003


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?