Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
School Psychology International
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Haboush, K. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Group Supervision of School Psychologists in Training

Karen L. Haboush

Graduate School of Applied and Professional Psychology, Rutgers University, New Jersey, USA

Eshel and Koriat (2001) have suggested that training programs for school psychologists possess both a manifest (`formal') and latent (`informal') curriculum pertaining to the enhancement of both technical competencies and more autonomous professional functioning, respectively. In addition to influencing coursework, the informal curriculum also shapes the manner in which training programs provide supervision. Although effective supervision is believed to lead to more effective school psychology practice, much of the literature has emphasized the technical skills which supervision aims to improve. Little has been written about the nature of group supervision for school psychologists in training, especially from the standpoint of utilizing a more process-oriented approach as a vehicle for realizing the informal curriculum. In organizing the supervisor's approach to running such a group, the following theoretical models may prove effective: attachment theory, object relations theory, group theory and self psychology. Case examples will be discussed in order to illustrate the application of these theoretical frameworks to the supervisory process. Ethical challenges to running supervision groups within a training program will also be discussed.

School Psychology International, Vol. 24, No. 2, 232-255 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/0143034303024002007
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 The Counseling PsychologistHome page
A. Kaduvettoor, T. O'Shaughnessy, Y. Mori, C. Beverly III, R. D. Weatherford, and N. Ladany
Helpful and Hindering Multicultural Events in Group Supervision: Climate and Multicultural Competence
The Counseling Psychologist, August 1, 2009; 37(6): 786 - 820.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 School Psychology InternationalHome page
M. K. E. Lahman, R. C. D'amato, S. Stecker, and E. Mcgrain
Addressing the Shortage of Rural School Psychologists via Technology: Using Candidate Qualitative Interviews to Inform Practice
School Psychology International, October 1, 2006; 27(4): 439 - 461.
[Abstract] [PDF]