Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
School Psychology International
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kirkcaldy, B. D.
Right arrow Articles by Thome, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Personality, Aggressivity and Recreational Preference in Behaviourally Disturbed and Non-Disturbed Boys

B. D. Kirkcaldy

E. Thome

Rehabilitation Centre, University of Cologne

A vast amount of research has been conducted in the area of personality differences between 'behaviourally disturbed' and 'non-disturbed' children. In a classical analysis of delinquents, Burt (1944) found they were characterized as being less intelligent, possessing heightened levels of excitability and toughmindedness (unsentimental, insensitive and solitary). Shrider (1962) and Pennington (1954) employed the HSPQ and found delinquents to be lower in intelligence, thicker-skinned (impulsive, adventurous and active), lacking in social ego-strength and more radical and experimental. Glueck and Glueck (1950) and Hathaway and Monashesi (1953) had made comparisons between delinquents and non-delinquents; the delinquent group were discriminably less emotionally stable, less serious and inhibited, unfriendly, dominant, liable to display greater mood fluctuations and more adventurous. Cattell, Tastsuoka and Eber (1970) had found a division of personality disorders which roughly correspond to the neuroses and the problems of behaviour or conduct disorders characterized by such factors as affectothymia, dominance or ascendence and lowered super-ego strength. Cattell and Cattell (1975) had shown delinquents to be demonstrably more solitary, less intelligent, more easily aroused, guiltprone, nervous and excitable. Eysenck (1960), in submitting data to factorial analysis (taken from children referred to guidance clinics), was able to distinguish between those with conduct disorders (typically extraverted neurotic), tending to swear, steal, be rude, aggressive and egocentric, with those children manifesting personality problems (introverted neurotic), who were likely to be depressed, seclusive, nervous and sensitive.

School Psychology International, Vol. 4, No. 4, 203-208 (1983)
DOI: 10.1177/0143034383044003


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?